Position Statement

Subject: THE REGULATION OF AUTOMATED DISPENSING DEVICES

Background:

A program of continuing education as a requirement for re-licensure should be flexible in design, equitable in application, reasonable to administrate, and yet structured enough to serve its purpose.

Position 1

Because Pyxis is exploring the expanded use of A.D.D. in non-pharmaceutical applications,thus it is important to establish when regulation should apply. All use of Automated Dispensing Devices (ADD) with pharmaceuticals shall be under the management of the Pharmacist in Charge (P.I.C.)

Position 2

Regulations should address ADD's with pharmaceuticals regardless of the configuration of the device and in all environments that they exist

Position 3

VSHP agree with current regulations except for audits; suggested details:

Position 4

Supports Pharmacist review of patient meds prior to drug withdrawal. If used for storage and dispensing for all (or most) doses scheduled for administration, regulations should also require a means by which orders for a drug are reviewed and approved by a pharmacist prior to the drug withdrawal from the ADD for administration.

Position 5

Supports the delineation of one lot # of a drug from another in devices. Currently some automation used in dispensing do not facilitate the differentiation of one lot number from another so long as it is the same size & brand of product. This is poor pharmaceutical care for patient outcomes.

Position 6

Supports the concept of internal management of A.D.D.s by the PIC in institutional setting where more then 1-2 machine exists. Lost of control becomes an issue when devices are managed by outside (non-employed) personnel.

Position 7

Supports the continued search for Quality assurance standards for ADD's. There is criticism for the absence of good Quality Assurance data that can prove these devices provide, not only economical, but quality values also.

Position 8

Supports the integration of ADD with the patient record documentation of doses administered. The circle is not complete until doses withdrawn can dovetail into doses administered. Without it there is duplication of effort and paper shuffling.

Approved by Board of Directors: 9/24/99

 

|Home|